To return to RAOK History Central please click here.
To return to the main RAOK page, please click here.

The History of RAOK


Table of Contents
Five Minutes a Day Kindness Together What About the Real World?
What Happened to RAOK? Weaknesses and Threats The Future is Us

Five Minutes a Day

In less than two months RAOK will be celebrating its tenth anniversary. For anything to survive on the net that long is amazing. RAOK is truely ancient by net standards. RAOK long predates MySpace, Facebook, or Web 2.0 Actually, there was a whole social world, in fact there were two social worlds on Web 1.0 which was in many ways far more open and interactive then Web 2.0. People were expected to at least give strangers the proverbial time of day and more often when people interacted in groups those who were different were part of the experience. One had to get along with those with whom one disagreed, not just those on a "friends list.&qut;

RAOK was the brainchild of Candi who lived in Newfoundland, Canada. She created the organization, then called Random Acts of Kindness (RAOK was just the abbreviation in those days), so that both she and, Lady Lacey, her mother, could find a place on the net where there was no flaming, no insults, and people worked on being kind and making the world a better place through small acts of kindness. No, small acts of kindness do not change the world, but they can improve one's immediate surroundings. That's a nice start and surely better than nothing.

Kindness in those early days was simple. Any one with five minutes a day could join. Five minutes was all it took. You found a guestbook on the web site of a person in need of support and signed it, or if you preferred, you found a readily available email address and sent an e-card.

If all this sounds quaint and old fashioned, it really was quite modern and in many ways superior to current social arrangements on the web. Web pages on plentiful free providers were public. Those who built them frequently learned some code or obtained a "web set" from someone who could create elaborate graphics. Users had complete control over their pages' look and feel. Web 1.0 was interactive. There were web boards and guest books where you could not only leave comments, you could also deposit graphic gifts if you were lucky enough to find somewhere to host them that allowed remote loading. Paid web space did this and for a time so too did Geocities. Today Photobucket and ImageShack accomplish the same thing.

If you did not want to sign guest books, there were many reputable e-card vendors and most web site owners had their email addresses out in the open. There were no viruses disguised as e-cards, and there was a lot less spam in inboxes.

Back to the top of the page.

Kindness Together

RAOK members were also kind to one another. RAOK was and still is a "ladies group." "Ladies groups&qout; are internet organizations with a sweet, supportive ethos, composed mainly of mature females who do not have huge academic credentials or heavy political involvement. Many members are rural or live in flyover territory. I am female and I lived in Columbus, Georgia when I joined RAOK, so I am a partial demographic fit. Unlike most "ladies groups," however, RAOK was always co-ed. We have always had some male membership. Our ethos, though has been kindness within as well as without.

This means that members supported one another through a variety of committees. The Care Committee (also known as the Angels of Kindness) took care of members who were sick, bereaved, or more commonly exhausted by care giving. The Hugs Commmitee made supportive web pages with graphics, poetry, famous quotes, and prose for prominent and long standing members who needed support. The Guestbook Commmittee, of which I used to be the head, managed the guestbook on the main RAOK site, and saw that everyone who signed it got a kind response, except for spam artists who found their upstream providers chased through ARIN whois. There were also birthday and welcoming committees, and the TLC Committee which made "awareness pages" to educate members about assorted types of real world suffering.

In addition, RAOK had a private discussion board where no criticism of members was permitted and conversation remained polite and civil or else.... This often meant a high noise to signal ratio, but the board was always a kind and comforting place once one got used to the style.

Back to the top of the page.

What About the Real World?

RAOK never did much with kindness in the "real world." Candi set up the organization primarily as an internet only entity. In addition, members of RAOK were geographically scattered all over the world. Not everyone was active. Real life prevented kindness, rather than acting as a a stage forit. RAOK only asked for five minutes a day. Real world volunteer efforts take a bit longer. Finally, given RAOK's target demographic, many members were themselves caregivers or mothers in real life. In short, they dispensed plenty of kindness without having to join organizations in their communities, raise money for charity, or even leave their busy homes.

I think with Facebook and with my ad-hoc leadership, some of this might change. I am single and a big proponent of voluntarism. There is no reason not to make real world volunteering part of RAOK's area of interest.

Back to the top of the page..

So What Happened to RAOK?

RAOK survived and thrived for many years. We had an active membership, and a ruling oligarchy that was civilized enough to pass the torch of leadership five or six times with the organization surviving intact. The committees functioned, and RAOK survived well into 2006, when a political schism ripped the organization in two. I don't know all the details. I never learned them. I sided with Candi, but was busy settling into a new job so had not been particularly active at that time.

Candi shut down the web board and restarted RAOK as an email group. Later she grew weary of the organization and moved it to Facebook. The current Facebook group site bears the signs of Candi's neglect. The introductory text is suited to the 1.0 version of the web. I doubt most of the new membership has ever seen a guestbook, let alone signed one or wondered why they should. They are more than a bit afraid to open e-cards from people they don't know and with good reason. The current RAOK guidelines also DON'T address third party applications.

This should be the end of RAOK, but of course it isn't. That I am writing this page, alone shows that. That there are fifty members of the RAOK group on Facebook, despite the group's currently crippled state and unfixable message, and absentee leaders means there is still a hunger to do kindness. The web changes. People don't.

Back to the top of the page..

Weaknesses and Threats

Long before RAOK tore itself in two, it faced a number of weaknesses and threats. The organization still faces them along with a few new ones. Please bear in mind that none of these are insurmountable.

FIRST: The open web is dirty and threatening. An unregulated dumb pipe architecture finally yielded fruit in the form of forced downloads and spam. In the fall of 2004, my computer got hit by a forced downloaded piece of malware while trying to visit a site that had signed the RAOK guestbook. E-card scandals followed. Spam now makes up ninty percent of all email and often fills guestbooks. Guestbooks and email and even static web sites are harder to find. Even using the inbox for a group mailing list, became a difficult proposition with members having to give up their email addresses due to spam. In short, RAOK was losing the place where it had once operated freely and safely.

SECOND: Money has always been an issue. Candi lived where the local currency was .60 of an American dollar for the longest time. The Canadian Maritimes are also similar to Appalachia in terms of prosperity or lack thereof. RAOK relied on Geocities for as long as it could, until remote loading of guestbook images became an impossiblity. RAOK never paid for the name, "Random Acts of Kindness," so another organization trademarked it. We just didn't have $300.00 US for a name. I have seen server space almost go unpaid for, though our domains never lapsed. Much of RAOK has always been on other people's web space, much as these pages are now.

THIRD: Human nature works hard against being kind twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week. People need to let off steam elsewhere. There needs to be an elsewhere for RAOK to survive. Elsewhere DOES NOT MEAN go play in the traffic. If you need rough and tumble political debate, sectarian religion with proselytizing or witnessing, dirty jokes, whatever...go, enjoy those things and then come back. RAOK started out by asking for five minutes a day, not any one's whole life. Still, the no-criticism rule on the members' board took its toll. Boards periodically exploded in drama, ugliness, and vandalism. Candi or whoever was in charge would take down the old board and start afresh with a board in a new location, often password protected to keep the trouble makers out.

FOURTH: A no-criticism kindness ethos can aid and abet fraud. There is one possible fraud that RAOK shielded and another one that it supported whole hog until an organization in the Netherlands exposed it. I can say I always suspected something was wrong with Gerri/Gery E. Drahn from the first. The letter sent by the husband infantilized a grown woman who had been sexually assaulted by a patient in a hospital where she worked as a psychologist. I realized something was amiss and decided that such an incident would have made news. I set out to verify it and found nothing in the Dutch media not even local stuff. I also found out that the real Gery/Gerri E. Drahn indeed was a German psychologist (Friesland is in Germany). Why would such a woman's husband be seeking out a largely American ladies group of strangers to help his wife? Wouldn't Gery/Gerri have had help through her professional organizations and support groups in her own country?

Later, Gerri's/Gery's story began to morph from being a victim of sexual abuse to being ill with some unspecified female problem to having cancer. Again, I was suspicious though I went along with sending support graphics because no money was involved. Ultimately, Gerry began collecting stuffed animals for fellow cancer sufferers and a local charity in Holland exposed her as not being sick. I don't even think Gery is her real name. Candi threw Gery out of RAOK. I have a lot more to say about fraud. Suffice it to say, we should have been suspicious a lot sooner. On the other hand, Gery, never asked for money. The stakes were low enough that she caused the organization little if any damage.

FIFTH: Facebook is NOT hospitable to RAOKing. Members lock out strangers and only associate with friends. RAOKing by its very nature reaches out to those we don't know very well as well as our close associates. Facebook also is full of third party software, some of which is malware. Imposing software on others via viral marketing, may not be a particularly kind act. There currently is not group consensus on how to deal with third party software. That may chance.

Back to the top of the page..

The Future is Us

Despite, all I have shared (and it is important to share because most members of this organization should know its past), RAOK remains an organization with a future. How bright that future becomes is up to us. RAOK has about eighty members between the Facebook and Yahoogroup sites. That means eighty people are still believe in kindness.

I think the Facebook interface while difficult is not unusable. With tutorials we can learn to reach out all over Facebook.

RAOK also needs a renewed public presence. These static pages are a start. There are also portions of Web 2.0 that are far more public than Facebook. At least two of us have had experience with Piczo. There are also wiki farms. Wikis are by their very nature expandable and public. RAOK will add venues rather than move members so those who find Facebook their warm, friendly, place or who can't be parted from Yahoogroups are free to stay there. Those more adventurous souls can try something new.

RAOK needs financial security. One of the things that killed Web 1.0 was the burst of the dot.com bubble in 2000. Free web providers and remote software hosts closed left and right. With the current economic melt down, any add supported venue is unstable. Say that three times face Thankfully, this page is on paid space.

I'd like to end this history optimisticly. It ends with us. It ends with the present. The web has changed. People haven't. They still crave kindness and they still want to spread it if they can find a way to do that. I think RAOK can help provide that way.

Back to the top of the page..